Comment

‘I’m in my 30s and pay 1pc to my adviser to manage my pension and Isa. Am I wasting my money?’

Rate My Portfolio: Victoria Scholar gives her expert opinion on a reader’s investments

victoria scholar

Would you like Victoria to rate your portfolio? Email money@telegraph.co.uk with the subject line: “Rate my portfolio”. Please include a breakdown of your portfolio, your age and what your investing goals are. Full names will not be published.

Hi there,

I’m in my early 30s, in full-time employment and saving £1,000 a month into my Aegon stocks and shares Isa (invested in The Quilter Investors Cirilium Blend Portfolios) which currently has £45,000 in it.

I’m also saving £450 a month into my Aegon Sipp (invested in the Quilter Investors Cirilium Dynamic Blend Portfolio) and sacrificing 5pc of my income (£215 a month) which is matched & doubled by my employer (£430), into an Aegon workplace default fund.

I also have £9,000 of shares in Boston Scientific, which I purchased at a discount, also by salary sacrifice.

My main question comes from the fact that all my Aegon investments are managed by a financial adviser who charges 1pc on top of Aegon’s annual charge of 0.13pc and then an additional fund management charge of 0.85pc for the stocks and shares Isa, 0.74pc for the Sipp.

Of course, financial advisers offer value in terms of broader financial planning, and I was assuming that paying for managed investments would mean they outperform the market but I’m not convinced this is the case.

I simply want to make regular contributions to a diversified fund (or a few diversified funds, if that would create a better spread) which bring compounding interest at market value over the long term, without losing money unnecessarily to costly ongoing charges.

I would very much welcome your suggestions.

Kind regards,

J

Victoria says:

Dear reader,

I think you’ve raised a critical question that will pique the interest of many investors, so thank you. It’s something I’m asked time and time again – whether it makes more sense to pay more for a financial adviser or do it yourself.

I have to declare an interest here as I work for interactive investor, a flat-fee provider of Isas and Sipps for DIY investors.

The most obvious reason to do it yourself, that you’ve already highlighted, is lower fees.

Currently you’re paying total costs of 1.98pc a year for your Isa and 1.87pc for your Sipp. That’s a considerable sum given you can own a diversified multi-asset portfolio of passive funds to fit your risk profile for around 0.2pc in yearly management fees, before paying a platforms fee on top.

We charge a flat fee while most of our rivals charge percentages. Always do your own research on costs and come to a conclusion you are happy with. Cost is just one part of how you come to a decision but there’s also customer service, investment choice, how good the website and app is, and so on.

Picking your own investments can feel scary, but there are lots of ready-made solutions on DIY investor platforms that have great track records, low fees, and invest in a similar way to your Quilter portfolio.

Taking a look at your investments, your Isa fund, Quilter Investors Cirilium Moderate Blend Portfolio, is about two-thirds invested in the stock market, has 12.5pc in alternatives (like property and commodities) and 10.5pc in bonds.

There is also a hefty 11.3pc in cash, so you’re paying a fee to be out of the market. The building blocks of the portfolio are a mix of passive and actively managed funds.

The portfolio has returned 17.8pc since 2019. Meanwhile, global shares (as measured by the iShares Core MSCI World Ucits ETF), are up 43.7pc, according to data from FE Analytics.

I’m making a slightly unfair comparison, as owning just equities is riskier than a basket of stocks, bonds and alternatives, blended together to reduce volatility. The right comparison, I believe, would be a 60/40 fund of stocks and bonds.

Two alternatives on DIY investor platforms spring to mind: Vanguard LifeStrategy 60pc Equity and BlackRock MyMap 5 (which has 65pc invested in shares). These funds have risen 12.3pc and 19.9pc since the launch of the Quilter fund. They charge 0.22pc and 0.17pc in annual fees.

That’s just looking at the fund performance. Given that you are also paying a 1pc adviser fee, your returns will be lower. While returns on your Quilter fund have not been too shabby, you can see that there are alternatives out there that you can access yourself if you chose to do so.

Think about how long you are investing your Isa for and whether you need to draw on the cash in under five years, which is considered relatively short term in the investment world.

If you are investing for the longer term, then you can take more risk. If not, then think about whether you can afford for your portfolio to be exposed to asset classes which can be volatile and whether you have a cash buffer to use in case of emergencies.

Your Sipp is invested in another Quilter fund, Cirilium Dynamic Blend Portfolio. This is a portfolio targeting higher growth, with 85pc invested in shares and just 3.3pc in cash. It has risen 27.7pc since August 2019.

Now, financial advisers offer a very valuable service, but for investors at the start of their saving journey, the solution, in my view, is pretty simple: keep costs low, don’t be too conservative, maintain a diversified portfolio and stay invested, topping up your portfolio as much as you can.

If you were entering retirement, then managing your financial affairs can become more complicated and advisers can add a lot of value, particularly on tax.

You might very well be more than happy sticking entirely with something like the Vanguard LifeStrategy 60pc for a hands-off approach.

And while I think a multi-asset global diversified fund should still make up the lion’s share of your portfolio as a core holding, another reason for doing it yourself, if you’re interested in markets and global trends, is that you can have some fun with some riskier “satellite” positions, only making up a small percentage of your overall portfolio.

You are still young and can therefore afford to take some risks if you feel comfortable.

As one idea to explore, Goldman Sachs just upgraded its outlook for Chinese stocks, forecasting gains for the MSCI China and CSI 300 of 12pc and 15pc respectively in 2024 underpinned by an expectation of strong earnings growth. Check out Fidelity China Special Situations.

I admit that there’s an overwhelming amount of products, services, advisers and jargon out there in this industry so it can be hard to see the wood for the trees at times. But it doesn’t have to be daunting – there is a clear path via DIY investing to maintaining a sense of security, keeping fees low and hopefully achieving long-term returns.

Victoria is head of investment at Interactive Investor. Her columns should not be taken as advice or as a personal recommendation, but as a starting point for readers to undertake their own further research

License this content